Desperate straits for the Climate Alarmists

When the young children are on the streets and the celebrities do nothing but talk urgently about disaster, you know things are desperate. Not so much in the "being reasonable " stakes but in the fear stakes . Fear of losing attention and power in the media .
After all CC alarmists have been predicting immanent disaster for decades now - and whats happened ?  (You heard it first from Emperors Academy Dec 6th 2018)

1. Have sea levels risen?  No but they keep drumming up Kurabati --shelf subsidence 
2. Have we run out of water Tim?  Do we need urgently to build more desal plants? 
3. Have the incentives worked ?Should govt continue to waste huge amounts of  our money on subsidizing middle class welfare in form of now dated solar technology. lights and insulation?
4. Has wind power evolved so that we don't have to replace the gearboxes in those flights of fancy of centuries old technology. Maybe its money spent on about to be superceded methods? 
5. Have they got more scientists to talk ? Credible spokespersons are getting rarer. Scientists who study these theories from different disciplines of science have always been rare One wrote Tomms against the simple equationists decades ago   Ian Plimer :Heaven and Earth. 
6. Why doesn't IPACC keep us in tune .It has a huge budget as do the sycophants in all Western democ racies Diurnal radiation transfers ,Glaciologists, geologists  and Physicists with questions. 
7. Have we made the option of change viable ? No the alarmists don't even seem to know what the alternatives are. Why don't we let the market decide on the new technology?. Why waste out taxes on todays version?  Why not tax energy sources "we" don't like ? cars heating with gas etc etc  Is the single focus on coal credible ? Don't make us laugh! 
8. Does anyone know what Greenlabor would do if it got the tax?      You answer !!
   I do know that in Victoria they have been  allowing some companies to gas out carbon sequested at taxpayers expense--for years. Do these governments really know what they want to do - let alone know what they want us to do ( ie shoud we all have white roofs?)   
9. Are we any further than good intentions ? The greatest evil was  done in the name of the best intention- at least according to our forefathers. Mr Daniel Andrews is smarter than to fall for that ; he is more progressive than anyone, or he thinks he is .  
10. Why not just raise taxes so wannabes can fund reaserch into CC problem identification and solutions.Their way for them and their way for us ,,,its all costs us heaps and them nothing .

Well for one reason the French are rioting over the idea of more carbon taxes . Our aussies  would too if they realised the depth of carbon type taxes proposed and implemented already. Luckily the ABC won't tell them eh !

1.  Attenborough is wrong . "The people aren't calling  for it " , The people calling  for it are wanting the people to pay for it ; and Richard told them people last week they, in particular were not logical - now he is joining their club and talking without focusing on sense .Is he really to be trusted? Is he so popular  he can't possibly disagree with whats popular ?
2. The children should be taught that if you are going to protest and suggest action, you need to suggest an alternative action and your protest could cost you personally .
   
   Otherwise you , kiddo may be remembered in history as irresponsible crap merchants ......at best