People who have spend a lot of time on TV and the media and in Public life,( was good to see a health care person on thedrum tonight) often don't get the reality check that their stupid ignorant and arrogant advice can cause great personal disaster .
I don't expect they could or should always know or care , but a life in the life of 2 ledgers, or relying on that class, is a dangerous thing.When you have power you need to know some of the dumb consequences your advice creates - whoever you are.
When Peter Martin from SMH talks up economic confidence after a huge additional budget deficit announcement today he's only doing what all students of the monster are doing - trying to keep confidence up .
Economists are not God and its madness to even give em a leg up when medicine of the big picture is required-----as wannabes seem to do when they get desperate.( as if the Federal treasury knows all for eg )
The reality is that the media talk with confidence too much as if they understand or half understand ; Even great new programs like the drum discourage bad news and so people with a more negative view are "out there in the cold the blogosphere " who publish more responsively, honestly.
The people who do the most work in our economy ( the reality therapists )often don't get paid - ask any of us who live for competence in ecomia.
ABC should have a random self select feed running under all its programs - make it hilarious but not so serious and certainly not funny - but more honest and useful sustainable real ABC and with much more competence ( without even trying) . The disturbing thing for those of us who know areas to cut is that the ABC always want to always talk macroeco ( deep 2column stuff) and really that's so course as to be plain crass in a prelude to another "crisis". Bad news is not bedtime reading boys .
The "eco" journos who went on to the drum tonight either know this or don't care that they are spending 30 minutes of our time not speaking to the failures - some bad news that could lead us to better news next time .- not practiced , not understood?
For Peter Martin to call schools program a monument is plain careless and discrediting ( reducing his credibility) to fix himself in stone ( buildingsand programs but not skills )too -so what if every kid gets a university degree : how many are using them? Many in charge don't need a degree.
Friday, August 2, 2013
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Mapping the wolf's habitat
Below is a little fantasy related to real world worriers and how they project their worries onto others. Some people, rather than learn and study risk , worry. If they should happen to become leaders they often insist on sharing their worries ( "we will get sued or eaten") to the great annoyance of those of us who learn to understand risk and get on with living - those who learn to know the boundaries of resilience and degradation . The only relief for our increasingly urban communities is if the worriers stand back and learn to trust those who live with risk all the time . A little knowledge is of course, a dangerous thing - esp when it comes to something as complex as our engagement with nature If you are not properly engaged with nature, you can tend to listen to every bit of noise and worry, because the dynamic of weather alone is always working. Unless you study nature properly you won't know when resilience and boundary protection works or when tooth and claw and basic ecological sensitivity will be ignored by man ( as it often has been ) You will let worry replace wisdom and comfort in your approach to managing risk .
Take those who you try to map the wolf -who try to define his territory ( The Overlay). The wolf may live in the forest at bit, but his best food source is out there on the plains. You may think you can predict his territory but the best protection is assuming he roams the whole Shire ( put the triggers in your zones dummies-- not in some broad sweep overlay) If you're smart you don't waste much time looking where he's not likely to be , but because people get careless in the comfort ones you have to have some triggers to prevent disasters in even the safest of "Its people , not natural hazards that are the real worry ( therefore concentrate on use and development triggers ) The users and developers and explorers ALL seem to get lazy and distracted .
see him coming zones" ( zones and use triggers can do all that .
18 people died in a unexpected landslide at Thredbo. The area would not have been mapped IN to a landslide overlay zone because landslides don't occur there naturally. The native soils of less than 2 metres depth are under laid by solid granite. In Thredbo's case, it was the very poor site management of all the “local lots together " that caused the extreme risk to one of them . Every building in that area can be built completely safely and easily , as solid rock is less than 2 metres below the surface compare to here where there is often “ no solid bottom “) . Site specific geotechnical reports would not have stopped the disaster as it was poorly planned and integrated road construction, drainage , fill placement that moved the risk level up to disastrous proportions. The deeper people and nature working together ( integrated planning ) problem
Once the planning school capital of the world , Victorian leaders have gone off watch in planning . They think they can map half the Shire and look for the enemy in only that hurriedly created boundary .Some animals are wise enough about ecology and life systems to know that permanent boundaries for some things do not exist . Our leaders do this at great expense ( and ongoing great expense) and still the animals .... keep jumping the fence . Forest may be a preferred night time habitat but near food is where they have to live and move .
Overlays don't work for living things because they have legs ,wings and seeds . Yet the Bauillieu government made special funding available recently to produce more of these blunt and inefficient planning instruments called overlays . Most overlays aren't worth the trouble they cause because habitat or risk now it is only one part of what must always be assessed as bigger territory . The whole is greater than the sum of reports, if you like. Fine if someone is sorting the relevant information from the noise .
It’s worse than like looking for a needle in a haystack because these overlays in practice create overkill and overconfidence ( for example : no one expects a fox outside the habitat lines when that can clearly still happen)
In planning , Victoria has gone backwards in adopting the non integrated myopic methods of other States; methods that cause us to cry wolf so much that we don’t have anyone really on watch --in the right place at the right time
We could learn a lot from the wolf - whether we are big or small players
If you are a referral agency ( under planning and environment act ) all the territory is your responsibility.. You like the authority , but have you accepted the responsibility? - we will find out if we haven't already. Keep mapping the risk yourself but don't risk overkill or overconfidence or confusion by careless publishing the components of the problem as if it was gospel - as if your expertise in marrying things together wasn't something you as public authorities really wanted to share.
Monday, March 4, 2013
His mate the crocodile
Some would have it that we should model ourselves on this hard nut game player and long term survivor. That would be , though , to limit ourselves . Maybe we should learn from the animals, not just be them . An outsider might suggest we have an identity crisis because we are even thinking like this
My point is though here is that we are more like the herd members than thems that lie in wait .
Only God knows how anyone could love sheep or these cattle - they are so easily led and so stupid.
So what's wrong here ? Clearly its our tendency act like a herd member. Exploring but not heeding the warnings. The paradox is that we don't know things and we are wise to not trust the herd all the time. Exploring is good for us, as is exposure to risk . We need to know where the boundaries really are . The universe is a big place - our job is to wander in places that won't increase our fear and our confusion . How do we gain that sense of comfort to know what the real boundaries are ; to walk around them and between them? .
Labels:
boundaries,
crisis,
fear,
herd,
identity,
lost,
predjudice,
risk
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Anticipating the enemy and just where it hides
Time now for a question that challenges us all ( i think)
What is evil all about ? Clearly I am not the person to
answer all your questions ,but with Bonhoeffer's birthday today , its good to reflect on how he and many
other believers saw it coming .
Background .
Who can not want to read a man who was taken off the Radio
in Germany 8 years before World War 2 started and , like Solzenitzen went back
to suffer in his home country when the West refused to take him seriuosly.
Chamberlain thought he knew but Bonhoeffer could see
it all coming .
Because so many don't
trust Christians to answer this question objectively and productively, I suggest
starting with a thoughtful and effective politician Edmund Burke and other efcetive people in democratic history who
said ( more or less ) " The greatest evil is done in the name of the best intention'".
So , simply , for anyone who wants to give this more than a moment's
thought........ its not about what's on the surface ,and, its not just whats
underneath but .....what's directly underneath what appears to be good .
Truth is often hidden (Even God hides the truth ---so if you believe what believers believe , you can forget being awefully clever!) .
Remember Eve's desire to know more about this - seems
reasonable doesn't it ? The knowledge of the difference between good and evil . Have you ever factored in Hilters , Mussolini .....and
Lenin's desire to make the world a fairer place ? Test Burke's assertion with
people you know,....... like yourself .
We never know what goes on in other people's minds ( only got to read our own to know we don't want to know - thankfully the evil thoughts in there go no further than headspace , most of the time - I'm speaking for myself of course )
What we do know is that Jesus, Bonhoeffer ,Martin Luther King, Solzenitsen tried to confront the little hitlers, not with swords, but with words .Herod confronts Jesus with accusations and wastes his words , Pilate confronts Jesus with a question and he answers it . Getting to the truth is hard work but at least then ,we know what we are REALLY fighting over. Games fought over anything but the tough stuff are common .
I am posting
elsewhere on just how important it is
that we speak up after trying to share my passion for young people getting good
jobs yesterday . It's confrontation that we are called to, to DO it , to
practice it , to take back what we say when we lose control of our mouths -in
love .To know when to open ones mouth and when to shut it and,......... when you have
gone too far .
The above men were angry men --read Matt 11or
" Strength to Love "MLK . Be angry , as they were ( passion for right
is not wrong ),but don't sin - confront others with the truth in the hope that
they might have faith in the power of one and the power of us together (
Tolkein stories come to mind!)
Labels:
accusation,
argument,
bonhoeffer,
confrontation,
flyin,
flyout,
tolkein
Saturday, January 26, 2013
The States use of fear can be really scary
As a competent practical professional environmental risk
assessor and passionate advocate for the rural poor ( 4 decades of work), I can't bear to watch how
politicians and the press use fear to mistarget real and present dangers in
favor of giants with feet of clay whom any fool can slay.( see many of my posts on conservation of water and resources , habitat , fire , flood , food production )
I spent 30 great
years advising State authorities about
how to improve and protect the environment. The job no longer exists because the politics of environment is now the politics of fear. The job no longer exists because the practice of properly warning people with science and risk analysis is now clearly secondary to the politics of fear.
I therefore have a problem with both the sheep and the current shepherds.
So what's in store for this year
for the sheep - another trumped up issue that we can solve ( or that disappears into the ether before the next election ) another wolf in sheep's clothing , a mere man fighting
ghosts.I therefore have a problem with both the sheep and the current shepherds.
Readers should know that politicians like nothing better than a problem they can solve - and if it turns out not to be a problem in the first place , all the better , for them .
The West is often vainly worried about something in its own backyard, when it should be out amongst the sheep in the Middle east or in Africa solving problems that tax our minds , but not our fears.
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Hyping up general fear and ignoring present danger .
I often wish we could sue politicians and the
media for hyping up general fear and ignoring present danger
.
These desperate to make news dummies create wasted effort on a grand scale by forcing private consultants ( scientists and engineers ) to back lowered building standards for high risk areas - ( Think --recent building collapse or flood damage )
In our day this should not happen anywhere in the world , but its now a common and growing thing for people with money to employ a good consultant to say how wonderful HIS/ HER new development is . " I just bought a cheap bargain block on a steep hillside or on a floodplain" .
The Right should get a big kick for their stupid support of all things private in this. There is such a thing as public interest and the Right no longer seem to know where to find it .
These desperate to make news dummies create wasted effort on a grand scale by forcing private consultants ( scientists and engineers ) to back lowered building standards for high risk areas - ( Think --recent building collapse or flood damage )
In our day this should not happen anywhere in the world , but its now a common and growing thing for people with money to employ a good consultant to say how wonderful HIS/ HER new development is . " I just bought a cheap bargain block on a steep hillside or on a floodplain" .
The Right should get a big kick for their stupid support of all things private in this. There is such a thing as public interest and the Right no longer seem to know where to find it .
Public servants dedicated to prevention and prediction roles can greatly reduce this growing disaster area. I know because I have been there and done that
You heard it first on 24th October 2012 from Emperor's Academy - horse for courses .
Sunday, October 14, 2012
Lost in the Forest of Hidden motivations
The dark forest - where you don't know whose going to attack you , when and why and
worse ..... without any real reasonability.
What could be more pathetic than a week of high level accusations by the highest level leaders in the land ?
Surely one great worry that goes with that is the confusion amongst the gang about what is right and wrong to say in such situations ,
Why are we so worried about saying the wrong thing? Is it because we no longer know what's right to say?
If we are realistic we expect careless words and fear and worry up front .
The more substantial worry is when even the troops can't fight the threat either.Those not being shot at and injured but able , you would think, to be objective about the risks in this dark place .
The pathetic failure of the "Insiders"ABC ( the observers) to even talk about the reasons for the confusion in all this name calling is a serious issue .
Are some of "The Insiders" like Leonore, too busy reading the tea leaves to recognise that flavour is really about something more concrete than the epistles of spin they weave each week - substance is about morality or perceived morality - a bit of a no go area for many of them .
Whatever you think of Andrew Bolt , it was his woman guest Amanda who finally hit the nail on the head; " playing the victim card" is the wrong thing to do ; Projecting the problem onto another is a possible consequence of unresolved application of guilt.
Its wrong for lots of reasons and lawyers, of all people, should know why. Why our leaders have this blind spot is itself a huge question because the answer could help explain why Greenlabor is now fighting in the forest and not in open country .The forest of post modernism where nothing is moral and only nature takes it course ( You heard it first from EA)
The most obvious basis for the confusion is that Greenlabor refuses to face the historical cultural reality that our law is based on treating the sin and the sinner differently .Most of them don't even accept that these categories are concrete, real and helpful .
Here' s the concrete bit. The sin is serious and we should hate it and prosecute it . The sinner on the other hand, is precious, redeemed and redeemable .Protecting every persons reputation is all of our jobs ,. And, by the way, we are all sinners, so its everyone's interest to be careful. Death by stoning can happen before justice gets a word in edgeways. Maybe the Eight commandment needs more attention that the fifth (killing) ? The issue of protecting person hood ( Slander Libel and so on ) is so precious that its got a whole commandment attached to it ( 8th ). If you slander someone publicly you should correct it publicly because someone's whole life may be at stake if you don't . Sin is the serious matter .There is no greater prosecutor on this matter than Jesus himself ( Matthew 5:21)
Clearly the women who backed Julia last week over her comments didn't know this. The closer you are to a person , the more you can stop the rot . The closer you are to a person , the more you can stop the rot .Those women were all close enough to Tony Abbott to stop the rot . The closer you are to a person the more you need to be a aware that it maybe your responsibility to carry forward the intent of the 8th. Men and women of character themselves will say " I know this man or woman " ."; "he/she wouldn't do that . Those women who spoke were close enough to say it , but they didn't . That's where they really failed - more so than in talking tothe mere words , all of which can be retracted in an instant.
The old believers are not stupid enough to prosecute on the basis of the bad word alone. Their books , while full of bad words, are not big enough to go on about all that stuff . They could see all this nonsense with word accusations and counter accusations all around them; Pharisees they called them. The books they wrote , like all good cultural stuff, is full of bad words and bad behaviour because each book is slowly but surely getting above it .Unlike our Parliament at the moment, the books they wrote get beyond bad behaviour fairly quickly; as the Labor leadership should have done .
Look , we all know we say the wrong thing - and we do it in anger or whatever and the best thing to do is to repent of it ( shock horror !.....but its the only remedy that actually works ) .
Presumably deep down Julia Gillard knows this and knows it because of her father, perhaps . We all need the daily reminder to hate the sin and not the sinner..... in order to get out of the dark forest.
worse ..... without any real reasonability.
What could be more pathetic than a week of high level accusations by the highest level leaders in the land ?
Surely one great worry that goes with that is the confusion amongst the gang about what is right and wrong to say in such situations ,
Why are we so worried about saying the wrong thing? Is it because we no longer know what's right to say?
If we are realistic we expect careless words and fear and worry up front .
The more substantial worry is when even the troops can't fight the threat either.Those not being shot at and injured but able , you would think, to be objective about the risks in this dark place .
The pathetic failure of the "Insiders"ABC ( the observers) to even talk about the reasons for the confusion in all this name calling is a serious issue .
Are some of "The Insiders" like Leonore, too busy reading the tea leaves to recognise that flavour is really about something more concrete than the epistles of spin they weave each week - substance is about morality or perceived morality - a bit of a no go area for many of them .
Whatever you think of Andrew Bolt , it was his woman guest Amanda who finally hit the nail on the head; " playing the victim card" is the wrong thing to do ; Projecting the problem onto another is a possible consequence of unresolved application of guilt.
Its wrong for lots of reasons and lawyers, of all people, should know why. Why our leaders have this blind spot is itself a huge question because the answer could help explain why Greenlabor is now fighting in the forest and not in open country .The forest of post modernism where nothing is moral and only nature takes it course ( You heard it first from EA)
The most obvious basis for the confusion is that Greenlabor refuses to face the historical cultural reality that our law is based on treating the sin and the sinner differently .Most of them don't even accept that these categories are concrete, real and helpful .
Here' s the concrete bit. The sin is serious and we should hate it and prosecute it . The sinner on the other hand, is precious, redeemed and redeemable .Protecting every persons reputation is all of our jobs ,. And, by the way, we are all sinners, so its everyone's interest to be careful. Death by stoning can happen before justice gets a word in edgeways. Maybe the Eight commandment needs more attention that the fifth (killing) ? The issue of protecting person hood ( Slander Libel and so on ) is so precious that its got a whole commandment attached to it ( 8th ). If you slander someone publicly you should correct it publicly because someone's whole life may be at stake if you don't . Sin is the serious matter .There is no greater prosecutor on this matter than Jesus himself ( Matthew 5:21)
Clearly the women who backed Julia last week over her comments didn't know this. The closer you are to a person , the more you can stop the rot . The closer you are to a person , the more you can stop the rot .Those women were all close enough to Tony Abbott to stop the rot . The closer you are to a person the more you need to be a aware that it maybe your responsibility to carry forward the intent of the 8th. Men and women of character themselves will say " I know this man or woman " ."; "he/she wouldn't do that . Those women who spoke were close enough to say it , but they didn't . That's where they really failed - more so than in talking tothe mere words , all of which can be retracted in an instant.
The old believers are not stupid enough to prosecute on the basis of the bad word alone. Their books , while full of bad words, are not big enough to go on about all that stuff . They could see all this nonsense with word accusations and counter accusations all around them; Pharisees they called them. The books they wrote , like all good cultural stuff, is full of bad words and bad behaviour because each book is slowly but surely getting above it .Unlike our Parliament at the moment, the books they wrote get beyond bad behaviour fairly quickly; as the Labor leadership should have done .
Look , we all know we say the wrong thing - and we do it in anger or whatever and the best thing to do is to repent of it ( shock horror !.....but its the only remedy that actually works ) .
Presumably deep down Julia Gillard knows this and knows it because of her father, perhaps . We all need the daily reminder to hate the sin and not the sinner..... in order to get out of the dark forest.
Labels:
commandments,
Gillard,
hate,
hate the sin not the sinner.,
insiders,
libel,
misogny,
nixon,
pleiberchek,
reputation,
slander,
slipper,
tanya,
vanstone
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



