Friday, December 20, 2019
More fake news from ABCTV
I have been listening all day to the ABCTV reporting of fires, mainly in NSW TODAY December 21st with Andrew Gaugin at the helm.
The ABC should be prosecuted for crying wolf with their constant talk of "catastrophe " , Until the wind gets up , the danger is , at worst ,severe , not catastrophic . http://ondewolf.blogspot.com..
Take the bushfires driven by northerlies in our area . Lorne went in minutes as did many areas burnt in 1939 fires .
Tuesday, December 10, 2019
Catastrophes occur because people believe half baked crap
Some examples
Background . There are always things we don't know in the precipitation of a man made disaster, but the evidence is that ,what was obvious to a few, or very few ,wasn't effectively communicated to those who could have done something to prevent it.
The occasions when no one saw the risk are rare and not the focus here.
The terrible truth is that there are often many ways on the road to catastrophe to prevent it, which makes the noise from constant general talk of catastrophe just another example of careless crap .
The other terrible truth is that not many of us are good listeners - especially when it comes our objectivity about a bigger picture. about the truth others may have ( Peterson's rule 9)
Take this claim from the climate catastrophians that "the end of the world is nigh " ,Why aren't many of us NOT listening to them?
I heard someone say on the sacred ABC that 100% of scientists agree with him , but that's a lie. Noone should follow a liar or treat the ABC staff as knowing what we need to know-- most are not anywhere near practicing scientists .A deep trust in what ALL scientists think is not very deep because scientists dont always agree - esp on implications of their knowledge.
I hate it that my profession is implicated but not properly involved (say debate), but you should know we scientists get ignored too- whatever we truly know!--
We are not listening to the catastrophians too because we don't really know where the climate catastrophe persons want us to run to? If such people want to be listened (and not further condemned ) they must succinctly save time and spell out the road to avoidance. No more burning of any kind ?, Sequestration of a truly substantive kind?
With volcanoes and landslides,it helps if a local scientist is on the ground , You the reader need to know there are none-NOW - there used to be before , TODAY you NOW get a noise on your phone or on radio . ring 000 what a huge waste of money is spent by state governments trying to act like parents to us ! "I will tell you when your life is at risk " --they say .You would be mad to trust them
It is the very crime of the catastrophians that they misuse hearing time by not being specific .
Is it the crime of our very own broadcaster that they are quite subtle and sly in refusing to let a variety of voices ( close to action ) be heard on the subject /their subject choice .( thankfully One 2 One and other programs like Arndo is changing things)
Real risk reduction always requires specific recognition of cocontentating forces. This is of course is the annoying truth -you have to listen to the long winded way of all scientists and observers in practice-to see when the planets collide --- too bad there are no short cuts,, and crying wolf kills )
The crime of the catastrophians is that they waste time talking about risk in ways which do not really address it .
The important but differing roles of the student , the participant and the observer ( very important subject noted here with S , O ' and P's below ) is not the main focus here.
The very human reasons why proper communication did not occur, as with the fable, is the focus here., I have had the privilege of being both S, P and O as a geoscientist working in rural areas.
These deep historic and ongoing realities in men's failure to really listen to each other MUST be taken as critical if we are to avoid both small and large disasters. Excuse making we can't stop, but by being alert and not alarmed ,we can avoid more disasters.
The Aberfan tragedy 1966
The risk of a pile of excavated fill going thixotrophic when saturated would have been observed by many people in most moist towns across the country. You don't have to be an expert to notice ( S+O) important things-- to be a good observer (O) ,
Geoscientists know the risk of landslide to be very high and the risk of slurry slide to come with momentum energy that would be developed by its height in the landscape ( the situation at Aberfan) . Sitting high above a city, its hard not to think slurry and landslide at some point. Why the blindness? (B)
While one might have expected the local geotechnical engineers (S) to have at one moment noticed the probable structural failure of fill outside, their daily focus was quite normally on structural failure inside the mine ( where lives were also at risk of being lost ) ,
A key risk for any of us is that we can be so close to something ( a good thing and the best thing ) (P) is we can't see it (S) We need to listen to each other to live well .
Prosecution of sound risk management usually requires at least TWO parties( eg P+O) to talk to each other.
We don't know who didn't talk to who, but we do know that as usually happens with HBC-- the obvious is touted as cause when in reality risk will usually run deeper. The creek was a focus for some but the low factor of safety was all that mattered . We know the very high rainfall of the time was blamed by management but those of who study the substance know that all sort of secondary is normally highly distractionary.
Yes for eg rainfall is a cause but,,,,,,,,,
If you cut no deeper that the risk of bush fire being increased by higher than normal temperatures (TODAY- drafted in November) you will probably be not advancing the cause of prevention protection and real wisdom about risk.
If you talk when someone else should be talking , you risk being the problem.
GPS on our phones should be used as a way of alerting people to risks.
You heard it first from Emperors Academy
Don' t forget to never leave technology in the hands of wannabes , Give it over to professional scientists ( and geoscientists in particular )
Background . There are always things we don't know in the precipitation of a man made disaster, but the evidence is that ,what was obvious to a few, or very few ,wasn't effectively communicated to those who could have done something to prevent it.
The occasions when no one saw the risk are rare and not the focus here.
The terrible truth is that there are often many ways on the road to catastrophe to prevent it, which makes the noise from constant general talk of catastrophe just another example of careless crap .
The other terrible truth is that not many of us are good listeners - especially when it comes our objectivity about a bigger picture. about the truth others may have ( Peterson's rule 9)
Take this claim from the climate catastrophians that "the end of the world is nigh " ,Why aren't many of us NOT listening to them?
I heard someone say on the sacred ABC that 100% of scientists agree with him , but that's a lie. Noone should follow a liar or treat the ABC staff as knowing what we need to know-- most are not anywhere near practicing scientists .A deep trust in what ALL scientists think is not very deep because scientists dont always agree - esp on implications of their knowledge.
I hate it that my profession is implicated but not properly involved (say debate), but you should know we scientists get ignored too- whatever we truly know!--
We are not listening to the catastrophians too because we don't really know where the climate catastrophe persons want us to run to? If such people want to be listened (and not further condemned ) they must succinctly save time and spell out the road to avoidance. No more burning of any kind ?, Sequestration of a truly substantive kind?
With volcanoes and landslides,it helps if a local scientist is on the ground , You the reader need to know there are none-NOW - there used to be before , TODAY you NOW get a noise on your phone or on radio . ring 000 what a huge waste of money is spent by state governments trying to act like parents to us ! "I will tell you when your life is at risk " --they say .You would be mad to trust them
It is the very crime of the catastrophians that they misuse hearing time by not being specific .
Is it the crime of our very own broadcaster that they are quite subtle and sly in refusing to let a variety of voices ( close to action ) be heard on the subject /their subject choice .( thankfully One 2 One and other programs like Arndo is changing things)
Real risk reduction always requires specific recognition of cocontentating forces. This is of course is the annoying truth -you have to listen to the long winded way of all scientists and observers in practice-to see when the planets collide --- too bad there are no short cuts,, and crying wolf kills )
The crime of the catastrophians is that they waste time talking about risk in ways which do not really address it .
The important but differing roles of the student , the participant and the observer ( very important subject noted here with S , O ' and P's below ) is not the main focus here.
The very human reasons why proper communication did not occur, as with the fable, is the focus here., I have had the privilege of being both S, P and O as a geoscientist working in rural areas.
These deep historic and ongoing realities in men's failure to really listen to each other MUST be taken as critical if we are to avoid both small and large disasters. Excuse making we can't stop, but by being alert and not alarmed ,we can avoid more disasters.
The Aberfan tragedy 1966
The risk of a pile of excavated fill going thixotrophic when saturated would have been observed by many people in most moist towns across the country. You don't have to be an expert to notice ( S+O) important things-- to be a good observer (O) ,
Geoscientists know the risk of landslide to be very high and the risk of slurry slide to come with momentum energy that would be developed by its height in the landscape ( the situation at Aberfan) . Sitting high above a city, its hard not to think slurry and landslide at some point. Why the blindness? (B)
While one might have expected the local geotechnical engineers (S) to have at one moment noticed the probable structural failure of fill outside, their daily focus was quite normally on structural failure inside the mine ( where lives were also at risk of being lost ) ,
A key risk for any of us is that we can be so close to something ( a good thing and the best thing ) (P) is we can't see it (S) We need to listen to each other to live well .
Prosecution of sound risk management usually requires at least TWO parties( eg P+O) to talk to each other.
We don't know who didn't talk to who, but we do know that as usually happens with HBC-- the obvious is touted as cause when in reality risk will usually run deeper. The creek was a focus for some but the low factor of safety was all that mattered . We know the very high rainfall of the time was blamed by management but those of who study the substance know that all sort of secondary is normally highly distractionary.
Yes for eg rainfall is a cause but,,,,,,,,,
If you cut no deeper that the risk of bush fire being increased by higher than normal temperatures (TODAY- drafted in November) you will probably be not advancing the cause of prevention protection and real wisdom about risk.
If you talk when someone else should be talking , you risk being the problem.
GPS on our phones should be used as a way of alerting people to risks.
You heard it first from Emperors Academy
Don' t forget to never leave technology in the hands of wannabes , Give it over to professional scientists ( and geoscientists in particular )
Situation normal
When the children insist they know things , wise adults stop talking . Pity about the not so wise!
THIS Aesops fable provides us with a quick link to reality and the poor ways we often deal with risks. Effective risk advice is about timing specifics , so many wannabes are out of order by always talking about it .
The problem of cry wolf is particularly acute in our age because less and less people have daily jobs ( like farming or working in the environment) which expose them daily to risk .
But that's by no means all
The stupidity didn't start yesterday and the children problem has always been with us .
What many ageing and inexperienced Western reactionaries don't realize is that they have fallen for excuses for our behavior ( nature does not dismiss nurture) and accepted the bad and immature practices of childhood. Petersons rule no 9
So the problem of panic talk is particularly acute in our age because we as a culture do not respect the authorship and calming influence of the whole truth that comes with study and experience -- Find and talk to the really busy people who know the area- if you have time .
Our homes are bombarded with noise and worry. Best to switch off the TV at least .
I'll leave it to you when you switch off the children
He --who like to thinks he knows more about the outside world "Did you hear the weather report for tomorrow Darling ?"
She ..who just lets him think things, but feeds him facts "Apparently there is a 95% chance that the media will find a new catastrophe to talk about tomorrow."
He "Whats for lunch ? "
Some other time we will continue the conversation about who knows more about what! The conversation is not always nice , because we will challenge each other , but very healthy
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SziWxOYTcDY3YHy9wnpR59aBstzXIYm6Lk2_8lr8TcM/edit?usp=sharing
Meanwhile , I suggest we all go to confession
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zRE_Bn-V8LuLhUQI4KIwoM4X5d0ToZHEh_EK-TbuXzg/edit?usp=sharing
THIS Aesops fable provides us with a quick link to reality and the poor ways we often deal with risks. Effective risk advice is about timing specifics , so many wannabes are out of order by always talking about it .
The problem of cry wolf is particularly acute in our age because less and less people have daily jobs ( like farming or working in the environment) which expose them daily to risk .
But that's by no means all
The stupidity didn't start yesterday and the children problem has always been with us .
What many ageing and inexperienced Western reactionaries don't realize is that they have fallen for excuses for our behavior ( nature does not dismiss nurture) and accepted the bad and immature practices of childhood. Petersons rule no 9
So the problem of panic talk is particularly acute in our age because we as a culture do not respect the authorship and calming influence of the whole truth that comes with study and experience -- Find and talk to the really busy people who know the area- if you have time .
Our homes are bombarded with noise and worry. Best to switch off the TV at least .
I'll leave it to you when you switch off the children
He --who like to thinks he knows more about the outside world "Did you hear the weather report for tomorrow Darling ?"
She ..who just lets him think things, but feeds him facts "Apparently there is a 95% chance that the media will find a new catastrophe to talk about tomorrow."
He "Whats for lunch ? "
Some other time we will continue the conversation about who knows more about what! The conversation is not always nice , because we will challenge each other , but very healthy
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SziWxOYTcDY3YHy9wnpR59aBstzXIYm6Lk2_8lr8TcM/edit?usp=sharing
Meanwhile , I suggest we all go to confession
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zRE_Bn-V8LuLhUQI4KIwoM4X5d0ToZHEh_EK-TbuXzg/edit?usp=sharing
Adapted from the confession used in Christian meetings worldwide for centuries .
Labels:
cry wolf,
disasters,
panic . warnings,
risk management
Saturday, November 16, 2019
Conflating the Conflagration
Last weeks media madness will go down in history as the last ditch effort of the worry warriors to try and make a case for a future holocaust - and incendiary end to life on earth as we know it .
"The bush fires are worse than ever ever before " .
Its not been enough to state science science science, the arrogant unqualified now break the fundamental rules in science . The ABC and many others have to promote a future hell on earth by joining the dots in a way which offends anyone with half a brain , "The bush fires are worse than ever ever before " .
The Australian newspaper was the only one to state the crap production in the media ; the real news about all the fake news
The poor old Age has forgotten what it is to report anything that isn't PC .Like so many desperate to avoid denying the failure of the progressive faith , they waste hours filtering facts to suit their theories.
.Does The Age remember we stopped reading it years ago ? . They remember how the Argus went under . An unrepentant subtle sly and bloody approach to the house on the hill won't save them from final judgement .
In a paradox of profound proportions these blinkered minds are out doing old Hanrahan. At least he was in the ball park ..
Meanwhile the real dystopian elements undermining the West go undiscussed -- except maybe at church before the normal speculation outside afterwards. Speculation is in the right order in such places .
"The bush fires are worse than ever ever before " .
Its not been enough to state science science science, the arrogant unqualified now break the fundamental rules in science . The ABC and many others have to promote a future hell on earth by joining the dots in a way which offends anyone with half a brain , "The bush fires are worse than ever ever before " .
The Australian newspaper was the only one to state the crap production in the media ; the real news about all the fake news
The poor old Age has forgotten what it is to report anything that isn't PC .Like so many desperate to avoid denying the failure of the progressive faith , they waste hours filtering facts to suit their theories.
.Does The Age remember we stopped reading it years ago ? . They remember how the Argus went under . An unrepentant subtle sly and bloody approach to the house on the hill won't save them from final judgement .
In a paradox of profound proportions these blinkered minds are out doing old Hanrahan. At least he was in the ball park ..
Meanwhile the real dystopian elements undermining the West go undiscussed -- except maybe at church before the normal speculation outside afterwards. Speculation is in the right order in such places .
Labels:
catastrophe,
hillsong,
The Age,
The Age Newspaper
Monday, November 4, 2019
The fanaticism of wolf risk worrying is all around us
Examples
1. Feminists on Q andA last night .Nov 4th2019 The modern woman who wants sexual freedom finds the man who takes the same licence to be bad company . What does she expect ? Reject traditional marriage with its paradoxical but workable tensions in honor, leadership and servanthood and this is what you get. Its abused by men especially tis true, but not by all men . The wolf is not visiting every house in teh street ; God knows why soem are leaving teh door open for him.
2. The risks of environmental damage are real , but if you don' t study the world , you don't realize that not all man does is bad ( new doctrines of misanthropy )
If you study the stuff of life you get to realize that resilience is real and provides real reasons when not to worry ; when to cut cull and carry and repair . https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AJI5nO4FipVQajqtnJm91NbQLh-axceVUpcu3qgHk-4/edit?usp=sharing
1. Feminists on Q andA last night .Nov 4th2019 The modern woman who wants sexual freedom finds the man who takes the same licence to be bad company . What does she expect ? Reject traditional marriage with its paradoxical but workable tensions in honor, leadership and servanthood and this is what you get. Its abused by men especially tis true, but not by all men . The wolf is not visiting every house in teh street ; God knows why soem are leaving teh door open for him.
2. The risks of environmental damage are real , but if you don' t study the world , you don't realize that not all man does is bad ( new doctrines of misanthropy )
If you study the stuff of life you get to realize that resilience is real and provides real reasons when not to worry ; when to cut cull and carry and repair . https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AJI5nO4FipVQajqtnJm91NbQLh-axceVUpcu3qgHk-4/edit?usp=sharing
Thursday, October 24, 2019
When do you ever learn something watching the ABC on environmental affairs ?
The ABC are not fear mongers you might say !
On the surface i think you would be right, because they go to a lot of trouble to not look like they are.
Which means, if it is true, thinking audiences need to dig deeper.
One of the reasons I don't learn much from watching the ABC is because they are so cynical.
Another reason I don't learn from them is that they don't employ practical scientist who can answer tough questions. Kruzelnitsky and Sampson love making points of theory , for example hoping the audience will be impressed , Most of us expect probability statements on real risks .
Clearly many in the ABC audience do not see the problem I have --- until you put the question above and the failures below ( just examples ) or mention Political correctness
ABC journos do have reason to worry ( on the reporting of environmental risk in particular )
On the surface i think you would be right, because they go to a lot of trouble to not look like they are.
Which means, if it is true, thinking audiences need to dig deeper.
One of the reasons I don't learn much from watching the ABC is because they are so cynical.
Another reason I don't learn from them is that they don't employ practical scientist who can answer tough questions. Kruzelnitsky and Sampson love making points of theory , for example hoping the audience will be impressed , Most of us expect probability statements on real risks .
Clearly many in the ABC audience do not see the problem I have --- until you put the question above and the failures below ( just examples ) or mention Political correctness
ABC journos do have reason to worry ( on the reporting of environmental risk in particular )
- The Science Show has been run for decades by a non scientist ,
- Some of the lack of controversy ( should be normal) is due to tokenistic, quickgrabs and ignorance the subject matter ( the other side of the story- esp political )
- Major political blunders on environment have occurred on their watch WITHOUT any apology about the fact that they ignored warnings from competent experts, Who were they listening to ??? Politicians ????
--1 State attempts to create water
--2 An 18 billion MD plan that isn't working-
--3 Rural people switching off ABC and watching SKY
--4 Many bushfire imperatives from RC's have not been adopted
3 They continue to expect us to believe polys and media people know things on the above eco and env subjects .. They read "Scoop" but never got it
THIS WEEK - PIDDLING into the Barham . The redgums need a real big flood to set new trees growing in sustainable sites ( not salty ones !!) http://cuttingedgecare.blogspot.com
- SEAL explosion ( landline ) I mean even today noone has twigged that the devastation that the seals have done in Lake Alexandrena is related to stupidly simple ideologues like Burke and Wong putting precious water into a semi saline pond in the gospel name of "environmental flow." The MD plan is NO plan is it doesn't cover "predictable events "
Thursday, September 19, 2019
Worry warriors out of their tree over the reef
The worry warriors are fearful of reef damage from polluted runoff from land
Lesson 1 Don't listen to people quoting scientists ( people will quote those who agree with them) ; listen to scientists themselves .If you are not a scientist you will often need to LISTEN long to a range of them because on these complex questions , they don't always agree and it takes years to gain competency over the ecosystems ( cf plant or animal ) involved .
What many citizens do not know too is that much so called independent science research on environment has been captured by the politically correct . eg the cuddly stuff . You will read here about soil -- where are the soil scientists in YOUR state Utopia group ?
Should you trust someone whose just outta school ?(
Should you trust those who claim to know all the important things cause their facts are at their fingertips on a computer playing with atmospheric physics modelling and because they are paid specifically to come up with more worries re climate ?
Lesson 2 The solution to pollution is often dilution . Make up you own minds and study the flocculation after events .
Lesson 3 Watch Utopia . People trying to do/help the experts do his/her job is driving the experts and honest brokers mad
Whose a good scientists to trust? One who admits he often knows more and more about less and less
THE REEF ( Great barrier reef Australia in particular) Note nearshore ( discussed here ) can be different from wavecut platforms etc
The reef like any ecosystem is a complex but resilient beast , Like all ecosystems it requires a number of scientists to understand the actual boundaries of each animal or plants, resilience and how it works both individually and together; the stresses in lifecycle year, season and circumstance are full of variables.
WHAT WE DO KNOW about near shore effects from streams .
read Douglas Murray in "The madness of crowds" )
Lesson 1 Don't listen to people quoting scientists ( people will quote those who agree with them) ; listen to scientists themselves .If you are not a scientist you will often need to LISTEN long to a range of them because on these complex questions , they don't always agree and it takes years to gain competency over the ecosystems ( cf plant or animal ) involved .
What many citizens do not know too is that much so called independent science research on environment has been captured by the politically correct . eg the cuddly stuff . You will read here about soil -- where are the soil scientists in YOUR state Utopia group ?
Should you trust someone whose just outta school ?(
Should you trust those who claim to know all the important things cause their facts are at their fingertips on a computer playing with atmospheric physics modelling and because they are paid specifically to come up with more worries re climate ?
Lesson 2 The solution to pollution is often dilution . Make up you own minds and study the flocculation after events .
Lesson 3 Watch Utopia . People trying to do/help the experts do his/her job is driving the experts and honest brokers mad
Whose a good scientists to trust? One who admits he often knows more and more about less and less
THE REEF ( Great barrier reef Australia in particular) Note nearshore ( discussed here ) can be different from wavecut platforms etc
The reef like any ecosystem is a complex but resilient beast , Like all ecosystems it requires a number of scientists to understand the actual boundaries of each animal or plants, resilience and how it works both individually and together; the stresses in lifecycle year, season and circumstance are full of variables.
WHAT WE DO KNOW about near shore effects from streams .
- Water bodies are usually precariously infertile, That is , they struggle to maintain nutrient recycling near the surface because gravity operates on both solids and solutes (the critical unseen particles )
- Life in water is dependant then on phases A- phases of growth and decline ; B phases of depletion and infertility ; C phases of dependency ( algae feeding fish bacteria protozoa zooplankton etc ) D phases of regeneration ( seeding spores and high substrate availability - from another phase ; phases or death or threat ( wind and calm )
- Fresh water entering salt water can release large amounts of much needed food but the various phases of growth and decline vary greatly with space and time , A turbid flood does not reduce light penetration in seawater for long as high salts flocculate the clays .( generally)
- In general and in the big picture, the reefs can benefit greatly from highly nutrient rich from land runoff. They after all often running near empty on some equations of productivity and growth .
- While soil could impact negatively on the growth of algae and various other species, the soil particles do not remain suspended for long and their attendant cation site attachments are welcome with little likelihood of deep deposits on reefs
- Do not panic . even the most turbid water coming from land is soon flocculated in sea water .
Take the fake news off the news please we don't watch the ABC much now anyways as they employ few practical scientists and follow the weight of the political moment in the direction of ignorant fear mongers and cynics.
read Douglas Murray in "The madness of crowds" )
Thursday, September 5, 2019
Utopia
Good art is often confrontational. It puts the current deep dilemmas in a frame; but it doesn't often do it nicely. When the powerful get fanatical they feel it face on, full on .
So why is there so little confrontational art around? ( working dog's UTOPIA , and MAD as HELL come later )
--The ABC would rather produce comedy and there is a case with their new domestic dramas that the --ABC have completely confused the road to fun serious domestic . Either way ABC Art is not cutting it
--The ABC do too much navel gazing in their own contexts ( mechanistic rather than artistic paradoxically) as GKC put it , the real anarchists are offsite .
Art does cut more truthfully and directly than this slow burn cynical nonsense of rationally driven action; where "my idea is always the best "
Art does this in a way that mere description ( the myth that sub scientists often adopt as gospel) cannot.
Powerful people (eg media and politics ) can't usually hack this sort of art in their direction because their world view is the present and the current action agenda is their own .
Art will tell our mothers fathers and leaders that their unrepentant blindness is driving us who know things all to despair and suicide ,
Art, at its best , puts the frightening human condition ( denial arrogance hypocrisy)of all .. to the test Those who hide behind talk of being most rational are currently most exposed .
DYSTOPIA
Good art for example on climate concerns would remind us that some thing is still missing from the self evidently super rational picture presented by the now fanatical powerful worry warriors.
Despite over ten years of fact,after fact , no amount of facts stacks up because the facts are self select . Only this week we have the ABC reporting the pre Archimedes nonsense that icebergs, when the melt , will raise the sea level . In water they are already displacing the water
Good art on climate change will probably bring the house down with just one well put laugh on the above programs . Poor art and politics is humorless .Its like living in 1984. no this , no that and only chocolate when you are good .
UTOPIA
While many of us who lost our opportunity to effect sound public service because of the quick fix politics of the media and politicians love Utopia , WE find it hard to watch the isolated sense makers like Rob and Celia get screwed - week after week. ( as happened to us ) whats needed to break the spell may not be nice, but we know its coming .
Our children can't afford to have the country being run by technological fix agents ( Ellul) , posies corrupted by collective incompetence that results from not weeding out unsound logic . the logic that increases the number of complicit consultants and public servants and alienates those who know better , I have written to Ida to ask her to get Arhn do ( or others ) to paint the picture of some of our lost and now largely silent prophets.
Real dilemmas in art are good, but sometimes not as effective in making us see solutions an seeing people amid their mistakes .
I love it how they get Celia to ask -- " talk to the future" (or are they just afraid to ?) some of us are always talking to a better future by simply confronting the reality of the unweeded garden.
So why is there so little confrontational art around? ( working dog's UTOPIA , and MAD as HELL come later )
--The ABC would rather produce comedy and there is a case with their new domestic dramas that the --ABC have completely confused the road to fun serious domestic . Either way ABC Art is not cutting it
--The ABC do too much navel gazing in their own contexts ( mechanistic rather than artistic paradoxically) as GKC put it , the real anarchists are offsite .
Art does cut more truthfully and directly than this slow burn cynical nonsense of rationally driven action; where "my idea is always the best "
Art does this in a way that mere description ( the myth that sub scientists often adopt as gospel) cannot.
Powerful people (eg media and politics ) can't usually hack this sort of art in their direction because their world view is the present and the current action agenda is their own .
Art will tell our mothers fathers and leaders that their unrepentant blindness is driving us who know things all to despair and suicide ,
Art, at its best , puts the frightening human condition ( denial arrogance hypocrisy)of all .. to the test Those who hide behind talk of being most rational are currently most exposed .
DYSTOPIA
Good art for example on climate concerns would remind us that some thing is still missing from the self evidently super rational picture presented by the now fanatical powerful worry warriors.
Despite over ten years of fact,after fact , no amount of facts stacks up because the facts are self select . Only this week we have the ABC reporting the pre Archimedes nonsense that icebergs, when the melt , will raise the sea level . In water they are already displacing the water
Good art on climate change will probably bring the house down with just one well put laugh on the above programs . Poor art and politics is humorless .Its like living in 1984. no this , no that and only chocolate when you are good .
UTOPIA
While many of us who lost our opportunity to effect sound public service because of the quick fix politics of the media and politicians love Utopia , WE find it hard to watch the isolated sense makers like Rob and Celia get screwed - week after week. ( as happened to us ) whats needed to break the spell may not be nice, but we know its coming .
Our children can't afford to have the country being run by technological fix agents ( Ellul) , posies corrupted by collective incompetence that results from not weeding out unsound logic . the logic that increases the number of complicit consultants and public servants and alienates those who know better , I have written to Ida to ask her to get Arhn do ( or others ) to paint the picture of some of our lost and now largely silent prophets.
Real dilemmas in art are good, but sometimes not as effective in making us see solutions an seeing people amid their mistakes .
I love it how they get Celia to ask -- " talk to the future" (or are they just afraid to ?) some of us are always talking to a better future by simply confronting the reality of the unweeded garden.
Thursday, August 1, 2019
They live the dream at our expense
One day Daniel Andrews will have to face the fact that he is a stooge for the incompetent, the fearful and the impractical. The only reason those types survive in power is because he is so nice and the city have a stranglehold on logic - Labor has become the great Australian stooge party .
History will not be kind to their complete incompetence and radical runaway reactive approach to everything .
Lisa Neville is pushed to make water because Andrews team and tradition led down to a meltdown of logic on water --- and have big bills to pay ., The realization that OUR subsidies for solar are benefiting the rich has only just hit them For all their comfortable time in power not one word in favor of incineration . Oh no we would rather just be frightened and stay frightened and worried with greenlabor.
Don't dare give our children a job in engineering solutions to environment risk - that would be forbotten .
We can t use word s like incineration or base load power and reasonable cost - better to export our rubbish and make everyone pay for our self righteous crap
. Labor when they are not just stunned, are afraid to move . so afraid to be seen stuck they move somewhere - somewhere worse . They end up costing the earth and creating the biggest Nimbyism known in modern time. We export the risk .
1st August LABOR's three Federal stooges ( there are more ) are desperate and desperately shallow in their thinking and compromised weak and unconvincing in their coalitions with the real world . Never get a job outside .
Fancy failing to see their resistance to free speech YESTERDAY is a sign of their own inability to deal with a robust discussion.
History will not be kind to their complete incompetence and radical runaway reactive approach to everything .
Lisa Neville is pushed to make water because Andrews team and tradition led down to a meltdown of logic on water --- and have big bills to pay ., The realization that OUR subsidies for solar are benefiting the rich has only just hit them For all their comfortable time in power not one word in favor of incineration . Oh no we would rather just be frightened and stay frightened and worried with greenlabor.
Don't dare give our children a job in engineering solutions to environment risk - that would be forbotten .
We can t use word s like incineration or base load power and reasonable cost - better to export our rubbish and make everyone pay for our self righteous crap
. Labor when they are not just stunned, are afraid to move . so afraid to be seen stuck they move somewhere - somewhere worse . They end up costing the earth and creating the biggest Nimbyism known in modern time. We export the risk .
1st August LABOR's three Federal stooges ( there are more ) are desperate and desperately shallow in their thinking and compromised weak and unconvincing in their coalitions with the real world . Never get a job outside .
Fancy failing to see their resistance to free speech YESTERDAY is a sign of their own inability to deal with a robust discussion.
Monday, July 22, 2019
What can you say about Q and A?
Forget making a big deal about Folau's focus on Hell . We have the ABC leading its progressives to that place where the dark trinity rests : blame ,confounding,confusion. . Last night's cacaphony of bleeting . blaming , talking over one another noise was like Hell itself.
Takes this overeaching effort by the high priests at the ABC ( "of course we can tackle anything !-" like our own mental illnesses) to force flush out the fantasy and hypocrisy in that ambition in that context ,
Its not about answering questions , but overloading us with them; and the pushing out dead old answers that don't work. There is also, according to the modern progressives, no way we can learn by reflecting back -the clear option at the evening armchair bar is just fast moving progress ( the name on their tram) .
This is what happens ( bit of real science in real consequence) when only the facts are valued and the means to put them together is not. Our attendance at the altar of the ultimate rationalists, is, as David Christian says, a predictable commitment to driving down the culdesac of epistemilogical despair.
Without agreed values, and an agreed faith , (that works) this form of unblessed sharing is just noise ( and avoidance and denial of the dual nature we all share ) .
Look at the scathing treatment of politicians and those who study to show themselves approved ( "We don't need the skilled. "
Why would God bless this worship of questions procalamtions and speculations when there is no real commitment in this" god I am clever at naming the concern"fest.
Thankfully , God was mentioned as the only Lifeline from such a maelstrom of mere facts and mental anguish.
God , if only a few presenters at the ABC would get outside, grow up and stop sharing their stupid cynicism( and quick fiz problem solving nonsense ) with the young people of this country ., .Tragic eventually and meanwhile just noise and frustration while they pay themseleves to do what.......?? they think might possibly have some slim chance of working ..... Stop solving problems
Not this evening at the front bar stuff - that was our job once
Please Ita Buttrose stop them trying to solve problems they don't understand . Even Heather Ewatt (( Backrods - good as it is ) _and Landline, for all their openess and light an airy flying and out are still not RESPECTING AUTHORS and institutions - the real basis for resilience which strengthen and sustains long term . Our polys ( apart from the current senate gurus) represenst areas and issues better then you have been --- and that saying something because they have marginal nit wits to woory about as well .How about you have a go a them sometime #
workingdog
The ABC has been playing god with the rest - part of and still is ( last weeks overly cynical and distracted hunt on 4 corners ) the faisco of arrogant reporters and wannebes bush poets own false leads and fantasises on how things work out here . It ain't right to construct the story from afar .
Takes this overeaching effort by the high priests at the ABC ( "of course we can tackle anything !-" like our own mental illnesses) to force flush out the fantasy and hypocrisy in that ambition in that context ,
Its not about answering questions , but overloading us with them; and the pushing out dead old answers that don't work. There is also, according to the modern progressives, no way we can learn by reflecting back -the clear option at the evening armchair bar is just fast moving progress ( the name on their tram) .
This is what happens ( bit of real science in real consequence) when only the facts are valued and the means to put them together is not. Our attendance at the altar of the ultimate rationalists, is, as David Christian says, a predictable commitment to driving down the culdesac of epistemilogical despair.
Without agreed values, and an agreed faith , (that works) this form of unblessed sharing is just noise ( and avoidance and denial of the dual nature we all share ) .
Look at the scathing treatment of politicians and those who study to show themselves approved ( "We don't need the skilled. "
Why would God bless this worship of questions procalamtions and speculations when there is no real commitment in this" god I am clever at naming the concern"fest.
Thankfully , God was mentioned as the only Lifeline from such a maelstrom of mere facts and mental anguish.
God , if only a few presenters at the ABC would get outside, grow up and stop sharing their stupid cynicism( and quick fiz problem solving nonsense ) with the young people of this country ., .Tragic eventually and meanwhile just noise and frustration while they pay themseleves to do what.......?? they think might possibly have some slim chance of working ..... Stop solving problems
Not this evening at the front bar stuff - that was our job once
Please Ita Buttrose stop them trying to solve problems they don't understand . Even Heather Ewatt (( Backrods - good as it is ) _and Landline, for all their openess and light an airy flying and out are still not RESPECTING AUTHORS and institutions - the real basis for resilience which strengthen and sustains long term . Our polys ( apart from the current senate gurus) represenst areas and issues better then you have been --- and that saying something because they have marginal nit wits to woory about as well .How about you have a go a them sometime #
workingdog
The ABC has been playing god with the rest - part of and still is ( last weeks overly cynical and distracted hunt on 4 corners ) the faisco of arrogant reporters and wannebes bush poets own false leads and fantasises on how things work out here . It ain't right to construct the story from afar .
Monday, June 10, 2019
The outrage of having a public broadcaster whose righteousness can't be questioned .
Yes he might say something nice about someone or some cause he has mauled ( like the church ) but really he's a menace ; promoting his own causes.Pretending to do 'science'
What a waste of his time and those who read him . All those years and he could have a promoted a cause that worked . This week he talks about all the work he put into a cause that noone else thought was credible .
Paradoxically the 2 of them were chasing windmills .
How many others of this sort does our public broadcaster cultivate ?
There is no limit to the lack of maturity amongst those who choose to know about everything but don't discipline themselves to know anything about anything .
These members of the Skimpole club console themselves with the fact that their knowledge is encyclopedic , Pity the depth of their understanding is microscopic ( unlike those who practice science, and don't worship it as the technocolor yawn merchants do.
On the surface the splash in the daily bird bath looks very interesting,, So Australia staggers on , playing with technology, and talking about innovation without really investing in the hard work of it . These people take up, like Skimpole jobs where they are fed and watered for their fact filled excitement about what is new .The real engine of growth is too boring and long winded for them.
The ABC don't realize that while chasing their own causes they can and do miss the real causes of note .Some old dinosaur sectors and specific scientists ( practical ones ) hardly get a mention . Even the sound ABC (Hutcheons and Ahns :"one 2 ones and fame "ones largely miss the quiet ones , not right at all . Jut chasing the wind
The ABC club don't believe in God ( even though He pays them ) so they become gods in their own right - and right in their own eyes ; rightousness
Unaware as Orwell warned us that the real products of innovation will arrive at a destination not covered by the media .
The progressives are straining to be too far in front to see where the momentum really is .
Ever learning but never coming to a working knowledge of what works --a nd not reporting it . As Skimpole says of himself .. "I am only a child".
If a child, then give the job to someone who respects the process of mature learning .
Put some experienced scientists into our ABC
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Attention seeking children need a scold
The one who cries wolf does not really know risk . He only knows the name of the fear .
Fine if this behavior comes from children - its natural enough.
We all know the scary nature of that noise when it comes from a child . That's fine - we will teach em out of it
But some kids never grow up.
What if half the country is run by noisy children ?, Those like Skimpole who know so much that they command attention , but know so little they can't help manage the simplest of risks .
This group know so much they can hide, as they have learned to do , behind their encyclopedic volume of facts. Skipholes are nothng if not well educated and well spoken everywhere advocating fact checking but nowhere to be seen on the ground with the implementation of their ideas . Like Skimpole they live inside the house . Worse they are parasites on the productive in the house
Watch out for them and the tendency to be a cynical smart arse yourself
Denial is far distraction and projection are more common in our lives than we are prepared to accept . Our experience with young children should have warned us , The terrible thin is there are children out there who have never gron For example We can all hide our cynicism with a veneer of care, as so many characters in Dickens do . Swimming in shit that is often well dressed (T. Dalrymple )
Its easy to project denial on others when , for example 95% of the people say " you don't care about the amount of hot air we generate "of the 5% of Climate Change deniers. Not so easy when a child in our house reminds us we too are guilty.
Cheeky brat know alls at age 14 are one thing ( quite normal ) , but NAbrats at 40 are worse than useless - unrepentant they just live to erode and corrode
Presumably Skim pole was told many times to stop living on his cultivated cynicism. excusing his false fears and incompetency and lazy life and thinking when it suited him .
The Skimpole club has grown -many do you know who hide their lazy and noisy parasitism in a cloud of cynical conversational-ism; such people have no trouble finding "friends ".
The fact is that not only was he a noise making nuisance his parasitism and compliance in nuisance made him even more unproductive than he would have been if he didn't cultivate friends or at least other cynics who could hide with him . Easy to buy some more food for talk from the frenzy that reigns when its all talk - who knows or cares whether it really goes anywhere - so often point scoring for pedants
We all ought to examine ourselves to see whether such a wasted life ( and silly knowing smile of safe cynicism) is something we will be remembered for .
Those children who never grow up need a scold from more than one Esther if they not to break the bank in their own home . let alone the one we share .
Fine if this behavior comes from children - its natural enough.
We all know the scary nature of that noise when it comes from a child . That's fine - we will teach em out of it
But some kids never grow up.
What if half the country is run by noisy children ?, Those like Skimpole who know so much that they command attention , but know so little they can't help manage the simplest of risks .
This group know so much they can hide, as they have learned to do , behind their encyclopedic volume of facts. Skipholes are nothng if not well educated and well spoken everywhere advocating fact checking but nowhere to be seen on the ground with the implementation of their ideas . Like Skimpole they live inside the house . Worse they are parasites on the productive in the house
Watch out for them and the tendency to be a cynical smart arse yourself
Denial is far distraction and projection are more common in our lives than we are prepared to accept . Our experience with young children should have warned us , The terrible thin is there are children out there who have never gron For example We can all hide our cynicism with a veneer of care, as so many characters in Dickens do . Swimming in shit that is often well dressed (T. Dalrymple )
Its easy to project denial on others when , for example 95% of the people say " you don't care about the amount of hot air we generate "of the 5% of Climate Change deniers. Not so easy when a child in our house reminds us we too are guilty.
Cheeky brat know alls at age 14 are one thing ( quite normal ) , but NAbrats at 40 are worse than useless - unrepentant they just live to erode and corrode
Presumably Skim pole was told many times to stop living on his cultivated cynicism. excusing his false fears and incompetency and lazy life and thinking when it suited him .
The Skimpole club has grown -many do you know who hide their lazy and noisy parasitism in a cloud of cynical conversational-ism; such people have no trouble finding "friends ".
The fact is that not only was he a noise making nuisance his parasitism and compliance in nuisance made him even more unproductive than he would have been if he didn't cultivate friends or at least other cynics who could hide with him . Easy to buy some more food for talk from the frenzy that reigns when its all talk - who knows or cares whether it really goes anywhere - so often point scoring for pedants
We all ought to examine ourselves to see whether such a wasted life ( and silly knowing smile of safe cynicism) is something we will be remembered for .
Those children who never grow up need a scold from more than one Esther if they not to break the bank in their own home . let alone the one we share .
Tuesday, June 4, 2019
Democracies at Risk - Australia
One state of 6 Australian States
- Victoria
Of 37 federal seats only 5 are rural and are very large with 6 regional areas making a total of 11 people representing the majority of Victoria ; 26 people representing the cities in the centre of this picture.
Background - the victory of the pedants over the principled. Labors insistence on the myopic dominance of one vote one value has meant for those living in the wide brown land that they are under the tyranny of being told what the regions problems/challenges/opportunities are by those in the cities who simply do not know them .
Yes we have had a miracle here in Australasia in May 2019( and there are bit challenges elsewhere ) but here is ours alive well and still to threat our home and ability to reason well together down under
A growing threat
I was drawn into politics simply because even though I had one of the best jobs in the world working with some of the most productive people in the world, the city started telling us how to look after the earth. That would have been fine if the city knew something we didn't ( and
I didn't have a post grad from our great education system ) but nothing in 3 decades of dealing with the most arrogant and ignorant alliance of ideologues I know means means Greenlabor should back off and show some respect .
Publishing for decades at http://thiselection.blogspot.com we have fully expected the show to be over years ago .
The battle is certainly lost as the Vic state level for decades with Labor now settled into a comfortable sense that they know something about something that requires our best skills and competencies. The comfortable team of reactionaries does not realize that if not done well attempted governance in ignorance risks the lives and minds and careers of those who are competent to deal with complex environmental and production challenges.
Will finish this tomorrow.
see the injustice here in maps 70 % of the seats are in cities except in Qld where the regions still have greater than 60% of the population in them. Of the 30 to 40 seats in each of the eastern states only a few are rural and regional .
Friday, May 10, 2019
A guide for the young voter -
Passionate young people - there is hope for the future
What my generation don't get is that thinking young people don't trust the parties - esp the majors .
Why do those mature enough to know better get sucked in when the Majors pitch their story to get power , Innocent Christians, in particular seem vulnerable to the naming of best intention when they should know that behind the surface can lurk great evil .
To help them--- I have drafted the guide for the young voter https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hn2f1GFyXzzxVqoYNWw2Gshjkq-Ndhn4dNp0HrM4QhQ/edit?usp=sharing
Good thinking mate !
Saturday, May 4, 2019
The maddest things ever are done because of guilt
Noone ever talks about the guilt factor so are we just giving up things for the sake of giving up things ? "
Greenlabor in 2019 are talking about US giving up everything to stop our carbon burning from killing us
Guilt is clearly in the air over fossil fuel use , but noone is talking confession -- so we must expect sacrifice - the other bloke? . Noone has to die do they ?
JB Peterson reminds us of the great murder danger by talking to the formative frame in western culture of the first murderer , Cain . offerings to the Gods -
According to that view , its not how much you give up that gets us to heaven but whether the sacrifice works , so far we have got lots of insulation and old tech solar cells but little more but greenlabor is hinting that we will kill the problem -- whatever the cost
With guilt affecting us all , How then can anyone believe anybody or any party when Climate change is mentioned . People are going to do and say the most ridiculous things because all western adults from all parties feel guilty .
Enough to kill ? Certainly enough to talk crap and piles of it .
Some parties even talk
of murdering our way of,life without admitting to or the real cost of trying to live without coal and pretending coal is really different from other fuels we all need and use ---
We do best to admit to guilt before we go stopping our way of living .
Greenlabor in 2019 are talking about US giving up everything to stop our carbon burning from killing us
Guilt is clearly in the air over fossil fuel use , but noone is talking confession -- so we must expect sacrifice - the other bloke? . Noone has to die do they ?
JB Peterson reminds us of the great murder danger by talking to the formative frame in western culture of the first murderer , Cain . offerings to the Gods -
According to that view , its not how much you give up that gets us to heaven but whether the sacrifice works , so far we have got lots of insulation and old tech solar cells but little more but greenlabor is hinting that we will kill the problem -- whatever the cost
With guilt affecting us all , How then can anyone believe anybody or any party when Climate change is mentioned . People are going to do and say the most ridiculous things because all western adults from all parties feel guilty .
Enough to kill ? Certainly enough to talk crap and piles of it .
Some parties even talk
of murdering our way of,life without admitting to or the real cost of trying to live without coal and pretending coal is really different from other fuels we all need and use ---
We do best to admit to guilt before we go stopping our way of living .
Wednesday, January 2, 2019
Why is the Trump phenomenon so common?
Q Why is there so much polarization and indifference to arguments from "the otherside" ?
A Because we have believed too much in resolving arguments with another argument ? You heard it first on Emperors Academy
It seems to me that --- its not the polarisation or strength of arguments that is troubling the West, but the failure of so many arguments to give strength to any argument .
As Greg Sheridan , following Dostoyevsky . says in his “ God is good for you “ if you don’t put God in the picture , you haven’t got a picture : nothing to frame, nothing to gain
People are pushing too hard with rationale when rationale is never enough. We all need to stop being so Greek and think more like the Hebrews http://thinkhebrew.blogspot.com
Because this new belief in the power of mere logic doesn't , work people are short circuiting good arguments and inserting power words to try and win moral points : annoying, non objective and often a waste of time.
Take an example of polarization that cuts deep - eating meat in the West .
Many westerners now attach "the survival of the planet " or the " cruelty to animals ;" to the paradox of animals needing to eat each other. We can build up a picture using such arguments but is it a consistent picture? No it is not - Many are NOW creating sins associated with meat eating of any kind.
Clearly from my point of view as an ecologist, the former argument is just not true to nature , Animals eat each other , the reason why humans shouldn't must come from a god camp of some kind ? Cruelty is not a God issue – it’s a man issue. Confusion about connections is now the new norm. . we could go on
I therefore conclude as a scientist that many people only talk science (because its supposed to have moral value ) but do not practice it - esp because they can't or won't follow a long argument or recognise the limitations and complexities of causation research .
When faced with their reluctance to go on the long journey of logic they chose the shortest route ....... and make you do all the work.
The lack of respect for sound science in practice is profound and was predicted by our best scientific minds nearly 100 years ago .
The chickens are coming home to roost in unhappy gatherings of god like roosters ; who only claim their own ownership of higher perches.
http://misplacedconcreteness.blogspot.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)